注册 登录  
 加关注
   显示下一条  |  关闭
温馨提示!由于新浪微博认证机制调整,您的新浪微博帐号绑定已过期,请重新绑定!立即重新绑定新浪微博》  |  关闭

宁老师留学DIY咨询

MBA及Master申请PS/Essay/简历/推荐信写作咨询人

 
 
 

日志

 
 
关于我

2009年7月份,我给一个老朋友(Simon FT-MBA,2010春季班)为申请MBA而写的Essay提了几点比较关键的修改建议。后来,她成功拿到Simon的Offer。再后来,她建议我做留学DIY咨询方面的工作,并向我介绍了我的第一个客户。最终,我的第一个客户也成功拿到几个TOP16商学院的面试并顺利拿到Duke Fuqua商学院MBA的录取。 本人毕业于上海复旦大学管理学院国际企业管理系,属于商科科班出身并且做过管理工作、有领导经验的人士。

网易考拉推荐
 
 

留学参考:How Recruiters Rank Business Schools (3/3)  

2017-07-29 01:13:02|  分类: DIY留学综合信息 |  标签: |举报 |字号 订阅

  下载LOFTER 我的照片书  |

留学参考:How Recruiters Rank Business Schools (3/3)
 

BY: JEFF SCHMITT ON JULY 25, 2017

 

 

The U.S. News recruiter ranking does come with some flaws, though none fatal. By averaging three years of surveys to compile a score, it is harder to quickly discern changes in recruiter opinion. U.S. News also doesn’t disclose the number of employers surveyed, meaning a few high marks on a particular school could have an outsized influence on a particular score. This lack of transparency is less evident in the Bloomberg Businessweek annual employer survey, which accounts for 35% of its school ranking.

In 2016, Bloomberg Businessweek surveyed 1,055 recruiters from 500 companies, down from the 1,461 recruiters and 672 firms that participated last year. Here, recruiters can score up to 10 companies where they’ve chalked up “significant recruiting experience in the past five years.” On the plus side, the survey methodology grants greater weight to employers that hire more MBAs. However, this is offset by Bloomberg Businessweek’s refusal to release its underlying data, with recruiters traditionally scoring schools on 14 criteria (using the same five point scale as U.S. News, no less), on areas ranging like skill sets. In other words, readers simply see rank and not score. This makes the ranking suspect, as readers have little idea about the distance separating schools when it comes to recruiter sentiment.

In many ways, the Bloomberg Businessweek ranking replicates what readers will find in U.S. News. Among both sets of recruiters — which undoubtedly have some overlap —Harvard, Wharton, Chicago Booth, and MIT Sloan rank among the top programs. In addition, Texas-Dallas and Buffalo proved to be anything but one hit wonders, ranking 24th and 27th respectively among recruiters.

In contrast, Stanford took a tumble among Businessweek respondents, ranking just 20th, scoring below the likes of Penn State, American University, Purdue, and Syracuse. The Cardinal wasn’t the only school to post disappointing results in Businessweek. Yale SOM, Berkeley Haas, and Virginia Darden, for example, all fell outside the Top 20 among recruiters, each of which losing 13-15 spots. In addition, respected programs like Vanderbilt Owen, Emory Goizueta, Georgetown McDonough and Washington Olin finishing outside the top 40 with Businessweek. These served as major departures from the U.S. News recruiter ranking, where all four schools have been on the rise over the past two years.

 

2016 Bloomberg Businessweek Recruiter Ranking

The U.S. News and Bloomberg Businessweek recruiters agree on several schools, including Harvard, Wharton, MIT Sloan, and Chicago Booth. The big difference: Stanford ranks at the bottom of the top 20, with Yale, Berkeley Haas, and Virginia Darden performing much lower than their rank would indicate.

Institution 2016 Businessweek Rank 2015 Businessweek Rank Difference
Harvard 1 4 3
Stanford 20 14 -6
MIT (Sloan) 2 5 3
Penn (Wharton) 4 6 2
Chicago (Booth) 3 1 -2
Northwestern (Kellogg) 7 2 -5
Yale 22 9 -13
U.C.-Berkeley (Haas) 26 11 -15
University of Texas-Dallas 24 36 12
Dartmouth (Tuck) 8 21 13
Columbia 5 3 -2
Duke (Fuqua) 6 7 1
Michigan (Ross) 9 8 -1
Texas-Austin (McCombs) 16 22 6
Cornell (Johnson) 11 18 7
Virginia (Darden) 23 10 -13
NYU (Stern) 18 23 5
UCLA (Anderson) 28 19 -9
Carnegie Melon (Tepper) 10 13 3
Georgetown (McDonough) 48 25 -23
Emory (Goizueta) 46 29 -17
North Carolina (Kenan-Flagler) 30 17 -13
Buffalo SUNY 27 46 19
Indiana (Kelley) 36 34 -2
Washington U. of St. Louis (Olin) 60 48 -12
USC (Marshall) 35 16 -19
Vanderbilt (Owen) 43 49 6
Georgia Tech (Scheller) 34 28 -6
Notre Dame (Mendoza) 50 32 -18
Chapman University (Argyros) 49 44 -5
Texas A&M (Mays) 21 24 3
BYU (Marriott) 32 31 -1
Penn State (Smeal) 13 30 17
Rice (Jones) 14 40 26
Minnesota (Carlson) 44 33 -11
Purdue (Krannert) 17 50 33
Arizona State (Carey) 54 41 -13
Ohio State (Fisher) 40 37 -3
Wisconsin 56 57 1
Michigan State (Broad) 25 39 14
Maryland College Park (Smith) 39 42 3
U.C.-Irvine (Merage) 78 73 -5
Georgia (Terry) 68 58 -10
William & Mary (Mason) 52 15 -37
Illinois 33 65 32
Pittsburgh (Katz) 62 52 -10
Northeastern 70 67 -3
George Washington 59 40 -19
Babson (Olin) 73 69 -4
North Carolina State (Jenkins) 55 20 -35
Syracuse (Whitman) 19 47 28
Fordham (Gabelli) 29 53 24
Pepperdine (Graziadio) 66 62 -4
University of Washington (Foster) 12 12 0
Boston College (Carroll) 47 NR NA
SMU (Cox) 31 35 4
Missouri (Trulaske) 71 51 -20
Texas Christian (Neeley) 63 56 -7
Utah (Eccles) 61 70 9
Rochester (Simon) 38 38 0
Colorado (Leeds) 83 74 -9
Boston U. 58 64 6
Baylor 77 NR NA
Case Western (Weatherhead) 72 NR NA
Cincinnati (Lindner) 80 68 -12
Iowa (Tippie) 41 60 19
Rutgers 42 NR NA
Kentucky (Gatton) 64 63 -1
Oklahoma (Price) 45 66 21
Florida (Hough) 74 55 -19
U.C.-San Diego (Rady) 86 72 -14
Miami (FL) 57 27 -30
Mississippi 37 71 34
American University 15 NR NA
South Carolina 51 NR NA
Oregon 53 NR NA
Texas Tech (Rawls) 65 NR NA
Arizona (Eller) 67 NR NA
Tulane 69 NR NA
Howard 75 NR NA
Willamette (Atkinson) 76 NR NA
Connecticut 79 NR NA
Houston (Bauer) 81 NR NA
Tampa 82 NR NA
Denver 84 NR NA
San Diego 85 NR NA
San Diego State 87 NR NA


NR = Not Ranked NA = Not Applicable

Source: Bloomberg Businessweek

 

 

 

 

以上内容摘自:

http://poetsandquants.com/2017/07/25/how-recruiters-rank-business-schools/

 

 

宁老师(Coach Ning)联系方式:

QQ906866938

微信:可通过qq号加宁老师微信

微信公众号:宁老师DIY留学咨询

SKYPEessay-ningchunlong

LinkedIn账号:http://cn.linkedin.com/pub/chunlong-ning/30/28/409

新浪微博:http://weibo.com/ningchunlong

网易博客:http://ningchunlong.blog.163.com/

腾讯博客:http://user.qzone.qq.com/906866938/2

宁老师(Coach NingDIY留学咨询服务说明与收费标准(2016-2017

http://ningchunlong.blog.163.com/blog/static/1153712692016461220967

http://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzA4MDU3MzYxOA==&mid=504022883&idx=1&sn=bb813d21e4565b2911bb7e6cdbc9a07d#rd

(注:上述两个服务说明的链接,若一个无法打开请点击另一个)

宁老师Coach Ning部分MBA或者Master咨询成功案例介绍

http://ningchunlong.blog.163.com/blog/#m=0&t=1&c=fks_087069080082082074081082086095085087084064083087084069093

 

 

DIY留学申请交流QQ群:

MBA申请DIY群:137254413

Master申请DIY群:162474877

MSF/MFE申请DIY 群:27769133

HRM申请DIY群:122368914

MKT申请DIY群:228695973

MSA/Macc申请DIY群:234137969

法律LL.M申请DIY群:110533381

英国及欧洲申请DIY群:209994593

HK申请DIY群:247226867

Canada申请DIY群:255130861

新加坡香港MSF申请DIY群:82449369

MBAMaster申请差别很大请正确选择要加入的群

  评论这张
 
阅读(6)| 评论(0)
推荐 转载

历史上的今天

在LOFTER的更多文章

评论

<#--最新日志,群博日志--> <#--推荐日志--> <#--引用记录--> <#--博主推荐--> <#--随机阅读--> <#--首页推荐--> <#--历史上的今天--> <#--被推荐日志--> <#--上一篇,下一篇--> <#-- 热度 --> <#-- 网易新闻广告 --> <#--右边模块结构--> <#--评论模块结构--> <#--引用模块结构--> <#--博主发起的投票-->
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

页脚

网易公司版权所有 ©1997-2017