注册 登录  
 加关注
   显示下一条  |  关闭
温馨提示!由于新浪微博认证机制调整,您的新浪微博帐号绑定已过期,请重新绑定!立即重新绑定新浪微博》  |  关闭

宁老师留学DIY咨询

MBA及Master申请PS/Essay/简历/推荐信写作咨询人

 
 
 

日志

 
 
关于我

2009年7月份,我给一个老朋友(Simon FT-MBA,2010春季班)为申请MBA而写的Essay提了几点比较关键的修改建议。后来,她成功拿到Simon的Offer。再后来,她建议我做留学DIY咨询方面的工作,并向我介绍了我的第一个客户。最终,我的第一个客户也成功拿到几个TOP16商学院的面试并顺利拿到Duke Fuqua商学院MBA的录取。 本人毕业于上海复旦大学管理学院国际企业管理系,属于商科科班出身并且做过管理工作、有领导经验的人士。

网易考拉推荐
 
 

The US Can't Allow China to Dominate in Africa  

2013-03-02 21:16:35|  分类: 政治-财经-产业 |  标签: |举报 |字号 订阅

  下载LOFTER 我的照片书  |

The US Can't Allow China to Dominate in Africa

 

博主按:

原题如此,后来美国鬼子可能也觉得这个题目有些刺眼,在网站上作了修改,但网页链接上的内容无法更改了,还是原来的标题的样子。

 

If Africa Is the Future, the U.S. Share of It Is Diminishing

February 15, 2013 RSS Feed Print

Stephen Hayes is president and CEO of the Corporate Council on Africa.

 

The dominance of China in Africa can fill one with awe, no matter what your feelings on the matter. To some, it has the feel of the Borg in Star Trek assimilating all, or Amazonian army ants, conquering everything in their path. In fact, some react to the Chinese in the same manner as one would to army ants: simply throw something incendiary in their paths to slow them down, move out of the way and wait for them to pass, and complain about what they have wrought afterwards.

 

The fact is, however, the Chinese have every right to be in Africa. African nations are grateful for the roads they have built when few others would do so, the same roads that World Bank planning teams once would talk about for years but never develop, and the African leaders are no doubt grateful for the new construction rising throughout the continent.

 

[See a collection of political cartoons on the economy.]

 

The truth is also that the Chinese aren't alone in Africa. Turkey, India, Malaysia, Russia, Israel, Brazil, the Gulf States, and South Africa have all become major players on the continent. Turkish-built hotels are going up especially in North and East Africa. Dubai is building ports, Malaysia is investing in textile plants, the Saudis in agriculture, the South Africans in banking, shopping malls, and many other things, and the list just goes on. In fact, the non-OECD members are doing quite well in Africa, thank you. The rules and the playing fields are changing and the old order is not adapting. In America, we find ourselves saddled with our own cumbersome procedures and rules, and worst of all, our belief in the superiority of our own empire, just as the British and French once believed in the eternity of their own Empires. If Africa is the future, our place in that future is shrinking.

 

Yes, it is true that we cannot compete with the Chinese in the same way that China does business. We don't have the top down approach in planning and the private and public sectors don't work closely together beyond lip service to the genius of both. However, Africa is changing too. A middle class is beginning to develop in some countries, and a middle class is one with a growing private sector. The Chinese power lies in their relationship with the political leadership. The future in Africa belongs to those who develop a middle class filled with merchants, entrepreneurs, and consumers. No economy can go on forever with only the elite as primary consumers. Modern media will not permit this. Look to the Arab springs to see this. The season of discontent is upon us, and the winners will be those who meet the needs of their citizens.

 

[See a collection of political cartoons on the Middle East.]

 

The American strategy in Africa should be one of developing the middle class and linking our businesses with their businesses in partnerships so that we both have interdependent markets. Our AID programs should be retooled to move away from a traditional Peace Corps approach to development to one of building capacity and training for an entrepreneurial society that provides jobs for the many and not just on a one-on-one basis. The weakness of a top-down approach is that the people below see the benefits at the top and they don't see the trickle down to them. This cannot go on forever. The weakness of a bottom-up approach is that it is not cost-efficient and does not affect a population outstripping available jobs and markets. Our primary approach should be strengthening the middle class and providing jobs both in America and through our programs in Africa.

 

The president of the United States addressed in his State of the Union the need to strengthen the middle class in America. We now need to make that link to Africa as well. If a stronger middle class means a stronger America why would not the same be for Africa?

  评论这张
 
阅读(163)| 评论(0)
推荐 转载

历史上的今天

在LOFTER的更多文章

评论

<#--最新日志,群博日志--> <#--推荐日志--> <#--引用记录--> <#--博主推荐--> <#--随机阅读--> <#--首页推荐--> <#--历史上的今天--> <#--被推荐日志--> <#--上一篇,下一篇--> <#-- 热度 --> <#-- 网易新闻广告 --> <#--右边模块结构--> <#--评论模块结构--> <#--引用模块结构--> <#--博主发起的投票-->
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

页脚

网易公司版权所有 ©1997-2017